Legal Opinion

Kertson v. Great Northern Express Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 25, 1898No. Nos. 11,053-(71)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff! from an order of the district court for Clay county, Baxter, J., granting a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Action in replevin. The property, a coat, was shipped by plaintiff’s sister-in-law, at Belvidere, Illinois, over defendant’s express line, consigned to him at Moorhead, Minnesota, “C. O. D. $50.” When the coat reached its destination, the plaintiff tendered defendant’s charges for transportation, and demanded the property, which the defendant refused to deliver unless he would also pay the $50. This plaintiff refused to pay, and then brought this action.

It appeared on the trial that plaintiff was the general owner of the coat, but that his sister-in-law, the consignor, claimed a lien upon it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wood v. CullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
  2. Columbia Placer Co. v. Bucyrus Steam Shovel & Dredge Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gay v. KelleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Kaiser v. ButchartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. Helm v. Smith-Fee Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. Jenkinson v. KoesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  5. Karnofsky v. Wells-Dickey Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API