Legal Opinion

Wiley v. Murphree

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 21, 1933No. 4 Div. 741PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The administration of the estate of testatrix was duly removed from the probate court to the circuit court at the instance of the executor. A hill filed by the executor of said testatrix sought construction of the will, particularly of the fifth and sixth paragraphs thereof.

The decree was based on pleadings and an agreed statement of facts. It was to the effect that the six securities held by testatrix and issued by the board of county commissioners of Madison county, Ala., were and “are warrants”; that “they constitute a part of the remainder of the estate” of testatrix…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Chambers v. RingstaffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. Gunter v. TownsendSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  4. Ralls v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Fowlkes v. ClaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cook v. MortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  2. Smith v. NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Jacoway v. BrittainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. Gafford v. KirbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Reid v. ArmisteadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API