Legal Opinion

King v. Scott

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 29, 1928No. 6 Div. 68PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The security for cost's of the appeal recites that it is taken from the judgment of the court granting the motion for a new trial to plaintiff, and the citation of appeal is to like effect. There is no bill of exceptions to elucidate the issues before the court and the action on the motion in granting a new trial to plaintiff.

The right to appeal from the action of the trial court on the motion for a new trial is of statutory origin (section 6088, Code [Gen. Acts Sept. 22, 1915, p. 722]) and subject to the reasonable limitations and presumptions declared thereof. The apparent conflict with…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Chambers v. RingstaffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Lewis v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Shipp v. SheltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Stover v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  5. Britton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Jawad v. GranadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Union Indemnity Co. v. WebsterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Johnson v. HodgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  4. Richards v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Hamrick v. Town of AlbertvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API