Baske v. Russell
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
67 Wn.2d 268 (1965)
407 P.2d 434
WILLIAM L. BASKE et al., Appellants,
v.
ARTHUR M. RUSSELL, JR., et al., Respondents.[*]
No. 37217.
The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
November 4, 1965.
Dimmick, Sampson & Savage, by Theodore E. Sampson, for appellants.
Ostrander & Van Eaton and Ralph I. Thomas, for respondents.
ROSELLINI, C.J.
The plaintiffs Baske had money to invest and on occasion had purchased notes from Stevens-Norton, Inc. The plaintiff William L. Baske (hereafter referred to as plaintiff) stopped in at that company's place of business, and expressed his desire to purchase some accounts.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hafer v. SpaethWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Wooddy v. Benton Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Eastman v. . ShawNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Baske v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Motor Contract Co. v. Van Der VolgenWashington Supreme Court · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.