Legal Opinion

Rogers v. BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 3, 2010No. 04 C 6476PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOAN B. GOTTSCHALL, District Judge.

Plaintiff David E. Rogers represents a class of participants in and beneficiaries of the Baxter International Inc. and Subsidiaries Incentive Investment Plan (the “Plan”). Rogers brings suit against Baxter International Inc. (“Baxter”) and several related defendants for alleged breaches of fiduciary duties owed to the class under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), Pub.L. No. 93-406, 88 Stat. 829 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 5 U.S.C., 18 U.S.C., 26 U.S.C., 29 U.S.C., and 42 U.S.C.). This…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Beard v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Hecker v. Deere & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Andrew Albert v. Oshkosh CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
  2. Chesemore v. Alliance Holdings, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2012
  3. Albert v. Oshkosh CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2021
  4. Baird v. Steel Dynamics Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024
  5. Bangalore v. Froedtert Health IncDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2025

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API