Chesemore v. Alliance Holdings, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge.
Once the concept of employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) gained acceptance in the early 1970s, their numbers grew rapidly. See Steven F. Freedman, Effects of ESOP Adoption and Employee Ownership: Thirty years of Research and Experience, 2007 University of Pennsylvania Dynamics Working Papers, # 07-01 (January 10, 2007), posted at http:// repository.upenn.edu/od_working_papers/ 2. By 1993, more than 9,000 plans were in effect, along with over 20 pieces of legislation encouraging owners of privately-held companies to implement ESOPs and share…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hecker v. Deere & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carol Chesemore v. David FenkellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Chesemore v. Alliance Holdings, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2013
- Perez v. First Bankers Trust Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Spires v. SchoolsDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
- Appvion Inc Retirement Savings and Employee Stock Ownership Plan v. RichardsDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.