Solis v. County of Contra Costa
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.
Appellant Contra Costa County appeals from judgments in favor of respondents I. A. Solis and Vincente A. Movida based on claims for damages for the county’s negligent spraying of weed killer onto their tomato crops.
Appellant’s contentions on appeal are: 1) that respondents’ claims were not timely filed; 2) that the trial court erred in vacating its findings of fact and conclusions of law and substituting new findings and conclusions, and 3) that the trial court did not use the proper measure of damages in measuring respondents’ loss. None of these contentions, to the extent that it is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Lambert v. McKenzieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Hole v. TakekawaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Hume v. LindholmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Rystrom v. Sutter Butte Canal Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carr v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- People v. PughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Khan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988