Legal Opinion

People v. Pugh

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1970No. Civ. 26579PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

The defendant and National Automobile and Casualty Company, the surety on his bail bond, have appealed from an order denying the bonding company’s motion to set aside the forfeiture of two undertakings posted by the bonding company.

Preliminarily, the appellants contend, for the first time on appeal, that the first of two bonds posted by the company was exonerated in connection with earlier proceedings in which a forfeiture of that undertaking was set aside. From the record it appears that no such exoneration was ever ordered, and that the bonding company acknowledged throughout…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. People v. WilcoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. DurbinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. In Re NewbernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. In Re BrumbackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. Wilshire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. THE STUYVESANT INSURANCE CO.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. People v. American Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. People v. United Bonding InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. People v. Ranger InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API