Mwantembe v. TD Bank, N.A.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SAVAGE, District Judge.
Introduction
This putative consumer class action asserting causes of action under Pennsylvania law for the defendant banks’ failure to disclose the deduction of dormancy and replacement fees 1 from gift cards prior to their expiration dates raises a question of the preemptive effect of the National Bank Act. Moving to dismiss the amended complaint, the defendants, nationally chartered banks, argue that the state law claims are preempted by the National Bank Act (“NBA”) and the regulations issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”).…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. Navient Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Jackson v. U.S. Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
- Mwantembe v. TD Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- New York State Division of Human Rights v. H&R Block Tax Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Jackson v. Bank of America, N.A.New York Supreme Court · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.