Legal Opinion

Kabban v. MacKin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 21, 1990No. 87-CV-274; CA A51117PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Plaintiff brought this action against Travelers Insurance Company (Travelers), Mackin and his employer, Bob Hart Insurance, Inc. (Hart), alleging claims for coverage by estoppel, negligence and reformation of the insurance policy. A jury found against defendants and awarded damages to plaintiff. The trial court also granted reformation of the policy. Defendants raise numerous separate assignments of error. We reverse on the reformation claim, reverse and remand on the negligence claim and otherwise affirm.

In 1979, plaintiff purchased a building in Grants Pass housing a restaurant and lounge,…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. SevierOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Paulson v. Western Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Bayly, Martin & Fay, Inc. v. Pete's Satire, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. ABCD...Vision, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Stinemeyer v. Wesco Farms, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. May v. United Services Ass'n of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Moore v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Herman v. Valley InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Richardson v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Federated Service Insurance v. GranadosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API