Legal Opinion

People v. Acuna

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 2000No. B131760PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, P. J.

Here we hold that a defendant who has been denied expungement of his conviction by an amendment to the Penal Code 1 enacted after he pled guilty has not been subjected to an ex post facto law; nor does the application of the amendment violate section 3; nor has he been denied due process, equal protection or the benefit of his plea bargain. We affirm.

Facts

On February 26, 1993, Gilbert Adame Acuna pled guilty to one count of committing a lewd act upon a child under age 14 in violation of section 288, subdivision (a). Acuna was sentenced to 60 months’ probation on terms and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. Eric J.California Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. CastellanosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Doe v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Obabueki v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  3. People v. TravisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. People v. ArataCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. People v. Fox, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API