Legal Opinion

Bray v. Dogs & Cats Ltd. (1997)

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 11, 2004No. A03-1413PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Relator Tara Bray challenges the decision of the commissioner’s representative that she was discharged for employment misconduct, disqualifying her from receiving unemployment benefits. Because the record shows that relator’s actions fell under the “simple unsatisfactory conduct” exception to the definition of employment misconduct, we reverse.

FACTS

Relator Tara Bray began work at Dogs and Cats Limited (DCL) as a sales associate in the Mall of America store in 2000. In January 2002, relator was promoted to the position of store manager. At first, relator did well in her…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. Schmidgall v. FilmTec Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. McGowan v. Executive Express Transportation Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Houston v. International Data Transfer Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  5. Marty v. Digital Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Potter v. Northern Empire Pizza, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  2. Brown v. National American UniversityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API