Anderson v. Hollifield
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
*429EAGLES, Judge.
We note first that there are numerous rule violations by plaintiff in this case. In our discretion, however, “we treat the purported appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and pass upon the merits of the questions raised.” State v. SanMiguel, 74 N.C. App. 276, 277-78, 328 S.E.2d 326, 328 (1985) (citing N.C. R. App. P. 21 (1988)).
Plaintiff first argues that the trial court erred in failing to set aside the jury’s verdict on issue number two as against the greater weight of the evidence. We agree. Denial of a motion to set aside the verdict is within the trial court’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Scallon v. HooperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. SanMiguelCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- Chiltoski v. DrumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Booher v. FrueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anderson v. HollifieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- Anderson v. HollifieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Taylor v. City of LenoirCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Taylor v. City of LenoirCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001