Legal Opinion

In Re Bayerische Motoren Werke, AG

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 2000No. 99-0734PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice HECHT, joined by Justice OWEN, dissenting from the denial of the motion for rehearing of the petition for mandamus.

If after a three-week trial the court refuses to render judgment on the verdict and instead orders a new trial on its own initiative, is the party who prevailed with the jury entitled to some meaningful explanation, not just that a new trial is “in the interest of justice and fairness”? When a trial court sets aside a jury verdict on its own and compels the parties to suffer the delay and the enormous expense of a retrial — tens, perhaps hundreds, of thousands of dollars…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Nicastro v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. in Re United Scaffolding, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Ramirez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  3. In Re Volkswagen of America, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re Columbia Medical Center of Las Colinas, Subsidiary, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
  5. Andy's Marine, Inc. v. Morse Controls Limited (u.K.) and Morse Controls Division of Imo Industries, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API