Legal Opinion

City of Boston v. Hills

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided September 30, 1976No. Civ. A. 75-902-CPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CAFFREY, Chief Judge.

I. PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

This action was originally filed by the plaintiff, the City of Boston (the City) against Carla Hills, the Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and others, on March 10, 1975. In its original complaint the City sought injunctive and declaratory relief and relief in the nature of mandamus from the operation of a regulation of HUD, 24 C.F.R. 403.1 et seq., which the City contends was invalid, which authorized HUD to exercise exclusive control over the level of rents to be set in units in “federally insured and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sleeper v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1979
  2. Argo v. HillsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1977
  3. 515 ASSOCIATES v. City of NewarkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1977
  4. Hill Manor Apartments v. BromeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. City of Boston v. Patricia Harris, Etc., Marion Hart, Plaintiffs-IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API