Legal Opinion
City of Boston v. Patricia Harris, Etc., Marion Hart, Plaintiffs-Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 17, 1980No. 79-1122PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
This case presents for the first time the question of whether new Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) *89regulations governing housing subsidized under the National Housing Act, 48 Stat. 1246, June 27, 1934 (now codified at 12 U.S.C. §§ 1701-1750g (1976)) validly preempt local rent control regulation. Unlike those considered in a long line of past cases, the newly promulgated HUD regulations which we must consider, 24 C.F.R. §§ 403.1, 403.8, et seq. (1979), specifically preempt all local rent control laws as applied to federally subsidized insured projects.1 We hold that the HUD…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Free v. BlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Whirlpool Corp. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Karl W. Hahn v. Joseph GottliebCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- Francis M. Langevin v. Chenango Court, Inc., and Robert J. Smith, Deputy Director of the Federal Housing AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cienega Gardens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Independence Park Apartments v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Burroughs v. HillsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- Topa Equities, Ltd., Coalition for Economic Survival, Intervenor-Appellee v. City of Los Angeles, Maria Lourdes Lara Tai Park, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Knutzen v. NelsonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.