Kondaur Capital Corp. v. Hankins
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
[¶ 1] Martha Hankins appeals from a summary judgment entered in the District Court (Ellsworth, Dobson, J.) in favor of Kondaur Capital Corporation in a foreclosure action. She argues that (1) substitution of Kondaur as the named plaintiff was improper because the original plaintiff did not have standing to bring the action; and (2) entry of a summary judgment was error because the record does not establish the essential elements of a foreclosure action without dispute as to several material facts. We vacate the summary judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
[¶ 2] The following facts, viewed in the light most…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. SaundersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Chase Home Finance LLC v. HigginsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- JPMorgan Chase Bank v. HarpSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- Tisdale v. RawsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- CACH, LLC v. KulasSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. BryantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- BCN Telecom, Inc. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- Beverly A. Gravison v. Calvert M. FisherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- State v. MaineHealthSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- State of Maine v. Dan BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.