Legal Opinion

Kondaur Capital Corp. v. Hankins

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 19, 2011No. Han-10-529PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

[¶ 1] Martha Hankins appeals from a summary judgment entered in the District Court (Ellsworth, Dobson, J.) in favor of Kondaur Capital Corporation in a foreclosure action. She argues that (1) substitution of Kondaur as the named plaintiff was improper because the original plaintiff did not have standing to bring the action; and (2) entry of a summary judgment was error because the record does not establish the essential elements of a foreclosure action without dispute as to several material facts. We vacate the summary judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2] The following facts, viewed in the light most…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. SaundersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  2. Chase Home Finance LLC v. HigginsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  3. JPMorgan Chase Bank v. HarpSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  4. Tisdale v. RawsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  5. CACH, LLC v. KulasSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. BryantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  2. BCN Telecom, Inc. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  3. Beverly A. Gravison v. Calvert M. FisherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  4. State v. MaineHealthSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  5. State of Maine v. Dan BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API