Legal Opinion
Tisdale v. Rawson
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided May 8, 2003PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRudman, J.
[¶ 1] Brian Rawson appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Ken-nebec County, Marden, J.) substituting Bruce Tisdale for the Piney Heights Road Association (Association) to cure the Association’s lack of capacity, affirming the District Court’s determination that the Association properly assessed Rawson for 1999 and 2000 pursuant to the Private Ways Act, 23 M.R.S.A. §§ 3101-3105 (1992 & Supp.2002), finding that the Association’s assessment method does not violate the Maine Constitution, and awarding attorney fees. Rawson contends the Superior Court erred by (1) substituting…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Advanced Magnetics, Inc. v. Bayfront Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Morton v. GTE Southwest Inc. (Wieburg)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Gulick v. Board of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Board of Overseers of the Bar v. LeeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Sturtevant v. Town of WinthropSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. SaundersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Elizabeth Brown v. Delta Tau DeltaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
- JPMorgan Chase Bank v. HarpSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- Victor Sunshine v. Stephen M. BrettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Kondaur Capital Corp. v. HankinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.