Legal Opinion
Angel Vazquez -Flores v. James B. Peake
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided January 30, 2008No. 05-0355PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KASOLD, Judge:
Veteran Angel Vazquez-Flores appeals through counsel a February 1, 2005, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) that denied a disability rating greater than 30% for nephrolithiasis (kidney stones), and denied service connection for a neuropsychiatric disorder on a direct basis and as secondary to a service-connected renal disability. For the reasons set forth below, the Board’s decision will be set aside and these matters remanded for readjudication.
I. BACKGROUND
Mr. Vazquez-Flores served on active duty in the U.S. Army from July 1963 to July 1965 and from January…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Caluza v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
- United States v. Michael JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Bove v. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2011
- Vazquez-Flores v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Michelle R. Goodwin v. James B. PeakeUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2008
- And Alfred R. Young v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009
- Angel Vazquez-Flores v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2010
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.