Angel Vazquez-Flores v. Eric K. Shinseki
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1Opinion of the Court
KASOLD, Chief Judge:
On January 30, 2008, the Court, in a panel opinion, set aside and remanded a February 1, 2005, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) that denied a disability rating greater than 30% for ne-phrolithiasis,2 and denied disability compensation for neuropsychiatric disorder because it was not service connected on a direct basis or as secondary to a service-connected renal disability. See Vazquez-Flores v. Peake, 22 Vet.App. 37 (2008) (Vazquez-Flores I). Subsequently, in Vazquez-Flores v. Shinseki, 580 F.3d 1270 (Fed.Cir.2009) (Vazquez-Flores II), the U.S. Court of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- John F. Cameron v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2012
- Angel Vazquez-Flores v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2012
- 07-24 353Board of Veterans' Appeals · 2015
- 07-33 440Board of Veterans' Appeals · 2013
- 08-23 584Board of Veterans' Appeals · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.