Legal Opinion

Romick v. Cox

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 28, 1962No. 16029PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by Charles Romick, successor guardian, from a judgment denying him compensation for his services in closing a guardianship following the removal of the ward’s disabilities of minority and her subsequent marriage.

William T. Cox had originally been appointed guardian of the estate of his two minor children, William Bond Cox and Jane Ellen Cox. The guardianship as to William Bond Cox had been terminated prior to the present controversy and is not involved in this litigation.

On March 24, 1958 the Probate Court of Dallas County on its own motion pursuant to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Easterline v. BeanTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank v. ForsythTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Whitfield v. BurrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Massie v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Thompson v. CrimmTexas Supreme Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dunn v. County of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  2. Coble Wall Trust Co., Inc. v. Palmer, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1991
  3. Sales v. Passmore, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1990
  4. Dunn v. County of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  5. Romick v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API