Legal Opinion

Dunn v. County of Dallas

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided July 17, 1990No. 05-89-01371-CVPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McCLUNG, Justice.

Gladys Dunn asserts that because the trial judge had previously recused himself, he was unable to take any further action, absent good cause. Consequently, the summary judgment entered against her was improper. We agree and set the summary judgment aside and remand the case to the trial court.

This case was filed in the trial court in 1983 alleging a breach of contract by the County of Dallas. Thereafter, the parties engaged in numerous pleading amendments and a series of motions for summary judgment over the next several years. On August 30, 1988, the trial court wrote…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dunn v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Walker v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Ferguson v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  4. City of Hurst v. City of ColleyvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Jones v. Springs Ranch Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Mosley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
  2. Cartwright v. MBank Corpus Christi, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
  3. Zurita v. Lombana, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  4. Parker v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  5. Carmody v. State Farm Lloyds, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API