Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Crimm

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1939No. 7257PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge German

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

This suit was instituted in the District Court of Rusk County by a number of parties, including Mrs. Sallie Bell Hammer, joined by her husband. Mrs. Hammer is now the only plaintiff remaining in the suit, and she will be designated herein as plaintiff. She recovered in the district court an undivided 1/9 interest in a certain 81 acre tract of land in Rusk County, and the judgment of the trial court was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 103 S. W. 855.

When Mrs. Hammer was thirteen months of age her mother died..…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Daniel v. MasonTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. McLaren v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Steed v. PettyTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Breitling v. ChesterTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Cauble v. WorshamTexas Supreme Court · 1902

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gaynier v. Ginsberg, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  2. Ex Parte WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Hays v. MarbleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  4. THOMSON OIL ROYALTY, LLC v. Graham, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2011
  5. Brown v. Grayson Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API