Legal Opinion

Whitfield v. Burrell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 25, 1909PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Lampasas County. Tried below before Hon. John M. Furman.

1Opinion of the Court

LEVY, Associate Justice.

—By order of the Probate Court of Lampasas County, Texas, made April 8, 1890, appellant E. E- Whitfield was appointed guardian of the person and estate of Eugenia G-. Whitfield and Ethel M. Whitfield, minors, and he duly qualified as such guardian. On May 22, 1907, said Eugenia G-. Burrell (nee Whitfield), joined by her husband, filed in the Probate Court of T.ampasas County a complaint in writing complaining to such court that said guardian had never made and rendered any annual account of his guardianship, or settlement in any manner, of his transactions as such…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte TowlesTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Allen v. StovallTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Marlow v. LacyTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. StokerTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Sheffield v. GoffTexas Supreme Court · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. At & T CORP. v. Rylander, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  2. Bradley v. Etessam, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  3. Carroll v. Carroll, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
  4. Massie v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Bolton v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API