Legal Opinion

Pacific Mutual Life Ins. Co. of California v. Tetirick

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 19, 1937No. 26189PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

This action was commenced in the district court of Tulsa county by William Francis Brewer, as plaintiff, against the Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company of California, as defendant, upon a policy of insurance for disability payments for loss of business time as provided in said policy.1 After the institution of the action and before trial, the plaintiff was adjudged incompetent by the county court of said county, and Guy C. Tetiriek was duly appointed guardian of his estate, and as such guardian was substituted as plaintiff in said action.

The case was tried to a jury, resulting in a verdict…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Penn Mut. Life Ins. v. Mechanics' Savings Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. OwenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. New York Life Insurance v. StaggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. New York Life Ins. Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Illinois Oil Co. v. PenderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stapleton v. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Heidenreich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API