Legal Opinion
Stapleton v. Holt
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 18, 1952No. 35172PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALLEY, Y.C.J.
The positions occupied by the parties are the same here as in the court below, and they will be referred to as “plaintiff” and “defendant.”
The evidence shows that plaintiff was engaged in the sale of implements at Cordell, Oklahoma. The note and conditional sales contract sued on were executed for the purchase price of a Woods Brothers combine. Defendant made a down payment on the machine in the sum of $745.16, leaving a balance due in the sum of $1,163.73. Half of that amount was due and payable on June 2, 1949, and the balance on June 2, 1950. Defendant failed to make any of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Bloch v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Operators Royalty & Producing Co. v. GreeneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Bigpond v. MutalokeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Pacific Mutual Life Ins. Co. of California v. TetirickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
3Cited by52 opinions
- Harold W. McClellan v. Bobbie Darrell CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Vitanovich (In Re Vitanovich)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Deady v. Hanson (In Re Hanson)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- A. A. Murphy, Inc. v. BanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Sauer Incorporated v. LawsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.