Legal Opinion

Porter v. Oba, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 20, 2002No. 9902-01426; A109420PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*209DEITS, C. J.

Defendants, Oba, Inc. (Oba) and Steven McLain, moved for summary judgment on plaintiffs claims for breach of contract and intentional interference with economic relations. The trial court granted their motion, and plaintiff appeals from the resulting judgment. Viewing the facts and all reasonable inferences that may be drawn from them in favor of plaintiff, the nonmoving party, summary judgment is appropriate if there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ORCP 47 C.1 Based on that standard of review, we affirm in part…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. McGanty v. StaudenrausOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Lewis v. Oregon Beauty Supply Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Uptown Heights Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Seafirst Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Overka v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
  2. Perry v. ReinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. Nixon v. Cascade Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. Houck v. Feller Living TrustCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Sizer v. New England Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API