Legal Opinion
Sharon Swarsensky Bilow, Cross-Appellee v. Much Shelist Freed Denenberg Ament & Rubenstein, P.C.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 7, 2001No. 00-2467, 00-2587, 00-3098PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Sharon Swarsensky Bilow, an attorney proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit against her former employer, the law firm of Much Shelist Freed Denenberg Ament & Rubenstein, P.C. (Much Shelist), alleging violations of the Employee Retirement Income and Security Act (ERISA), Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) and several state laws. Bilow has two principal complaints: first, that Much Shelist owes her money for wrongfully denied employee benefits, and second, that it violated the law when it fired her either because it discriminated on the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cheryl A. Gile v. United Airlines, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Lorance v. At&t Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mary Nell Little v. Cox's SupermarketsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Alfred L. Stone v. City of Indianapolis Public Utilities DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Taylor v. SolisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Shannon Kampmier v. Emeritus CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Thomas Larimer v. International Business MacHines Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Kouvchinov v. Parametric Technology Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.