Legal Opinion
Alfred L. Stone v. City of Indianapolis Public Utilities Division
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 1, 2002No. 01-3210PublishedCited by 348 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in this employment discrimination suit appeals from the grant of summary judgment for the defendants. As explained in an unpublished order issued today, none of the plaintiffs claims has any merit, and summary judgment was therefore properly granted. We limit this published opinion to a question on which clarification is needed. It is the proper standard for summary judgment when a plaintiff claims that he was retaliated against for complaining about employment discrimination. Two formulations are found in our cases, both adaptations of the ubiquitous…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gloria W. DOWE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY IN ROANOKE VALLEY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Fayette Long Jeanell Reavis v. Eastfield CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Byers v. Dallas Morning News, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by348 opinions
- Denise Coleman v. Patrick R. DonahoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Mickey v. Zeidler Tool and Die Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Daryl L. Johnson v. Cambridge Industries, Incorporated and Meridian Automotive Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Kidwell v. EisenhauerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Springer v. DurflingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
343 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.