Legal Opinion
Brock v. United Grinding Technologies, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 23, 2003No. C-3-00-541PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EXPANDED OPINION; DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #16); PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #27) OVERRULED; CONFERENCE CALL SET
RICE, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff William Brock began working at United Grinding Technologies, Inc. (“UGT”), formerly known as Sheffield Machine Tool, in 1992. 1 Beginning in 1995, Plaintiff held the position of Inventory Control Clerk. His duties included receiving and placing machine tool parts into inventory, pulling customer orders for shipping, organizing and staging parts for in-house…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dage v. Time Warner CableDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
- Taylor v. AUTOZONERS, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010
- Harrigan v. Dana Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
- Kathleen Norton v. LTCHCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Mena-Valdez v. E.M. T-Shirts Distributors, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.