Legal Opinion

State v. Howell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 1964No. 439PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PerR Curiam.

The defendant assigns as error the failure of the court below to sustain his motion for judgment as of nonsuit made at the close of the State’s evidence and not renewed at the close of all the evidence.

The defendant testified in his own behalf and introduced other evidence.

The failure of the defendant to renew his motion at the close of all the evidence constituted a waiver of his right to insist upon his first motion and it is not subject to review in this Court. G.S. 15-173; S. v. Hayes, 187 N.C. 490, 122 S.E. 13; S. v. Chapman, 221 N.C. 157, 19 S.E. 2d 250; S. v. Epps, 223 N.C.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. . ChapmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. State v. . PoythressSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. State v. . HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. State v. . EppsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. FikesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. RhyneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. McLambCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API