Legal Opinion

State v. . Epps

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1943PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScheNok, J.

While there are other exceptions in the record only four are set out in the appellants’ brief. Those not so set out in their brief are taken as abandoned by the appellants. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N. C., 562.

Exceptions Nos. 11 and 12 relate to the refusal of the trial judge to sustain the respective motions to dismiss the action and for judgment of nonsuit'lodged by each of the defendants when the State had produced its evidence and rested its case. C. S., 4643. After these motions had been overruled the defendants introduced evidence but did not renew their…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . ChapmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. State v. . HolderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. State v. . WhitehurstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. State v. . OvercashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. MainesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. BookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. State v. BraxtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. State v. VoncannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. HamletSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API