Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 1968No. 68SC42PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

Defendant assigns as error the failure to allow his motion for judgment of compulsory nonsuit made at the close of the State’s evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence.

Since the defendant introduced evidence in his own behalf, his assignment of error must be directed to the Court’s refusal to grant his motion for compulsory nonsuit at the close of all the evidence. State v. Howell, 261 N.C. 657, 135 S.E. 2d 625; State v. Weaver, 228 N.C. 39, 44 S.E. 2d 360; 2 Strong, N. C. Index 2d, Criminal Law, § 105, p. 653.

J. A. Woodham testified: That on 22 June 1967, he was employed as the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Shelton v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. State v. CoffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. State v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. CottenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. BerthaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Brown v. GreenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. State v. BentleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API