Corrigan v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
Before the court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment (Def.’s Mot.) and the following responsive briefing: Plaintiff’s Response to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment (Pl.’s Resp.) and Defendant’s Reply in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment (Def.’s Reply). Defendant moves to dismiss for want of jurisdiction plaintiffs Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA or Act) overtime claims that accrued more than three years before the filing of plaintiffs complaint on the ground that those overtime claims are…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hendricks v. Total Quality Logistics, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- Corrigan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Rivera Agredano v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Corrigan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.