Legal Opinion
Corrigan v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 18, 2008No. 07-541CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The plaintiff, John Corrigan, filed a complaint (case no. 07-cv-00541) (the 2007 case) in this court, pro se, seeking overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-216 (2000), and the Federal Employees Pay Act (FEPA), 5 U.S.C. §§ 5542, 5544, 5546 (2000). In 2004, Mr. Corrigan had filed an earlier lawsuit (case no. 04-cv-1587) which was decided in 2005 (the 2004 case). Corrigan v. United States, 68 Fed.Cl. 589 (2005). The 2004 complaint used virtually identical language as that used in the 2007 complaint currently before…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Palafox Street Associates, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Bowers Investment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Lewis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Hicks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Williams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.