Legal Opinion
WR Filbin & Co., Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 31, 1990No. Court 86-12-01588PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND JUDGMENT
CARMAN, Judge:
Plaintiff contests the denial of a protest filed under 19 U.S.C. § 1514(a). This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a). The Court holds that the merchandise in question is properly classified under 183.05, Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) “Edible preparations not specially provided for (including prepared meals individually packaged).”
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, W.R. Filbin & Co., Inc. is a customhouse broker that was the importer of record of the merchandise in question. Kisko Products (Kisko) was the manufacturer and exporter of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- American Express Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
3Cited by3 opinions
- W.R. Filbin & Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Cosmos International v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
- Warner-Lambert Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008