Legal Opinion

W.R. Filbin & Co., Inc. v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 25, 1991No. 91-1049PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHEL, Circuit Judge.

W.R. Filbin & Co., Inc. (“Filbin”) appeals the August 31, 1990 judgment of the United States Court of International Trade (“trade court”) holding that the imported merchandise was properly classified under 183.05, Tariff Schedules of the United States (“TSUS”). W.R. Filbin & Co. v. United States, 744 F.Supp. 289 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1990). Because the trade court applied the correct legal test and its findings of fact were not clearly erroneous, it properly upheld the Customs Service's classification of the imported merchandise as an edible preparation rather than as a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Daw Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Amersham Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. WR Filbin & Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. Lynteq, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  3. Sports Graphics, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  4. Marcel Watch Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  5. Bausch & Lomb, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API