Legal Opinion
Fonseca v. RBC Heim Bearings Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 28, 2000No. 3:99CV2205 (GLG)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
In this employment discrimination case, plaintiff has asserted claims for age, gender, and national origin discrimination under the Federal and State anti-discrimination statutes, as well as the usual laundry list of pendent state claims. Pending before the Court is defendant’s motion to dismiss counts seven and eight, which are claims for breach of contract and negligent infliction of emotional distress, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. [Doc. No. 8]. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion to dismiss will be…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Grossman v. Computer Curriculum Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- Golnik v. AmatoDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- Rapkin v. RocqueDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- Leach v. F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2000