Legal Opinion

State v. Wickey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 22, 1989No. 87-03-31515; CA A45134PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*227RICHARDSON, P. J.

The state appeals a pretrial order suppressing statements that defendant made to police detectives. The trial court concluded that the statements were elicited after defendant had invoked his right to counsel. The state argues that defendant’s request for an attorney was equivocal and that, therefore, the detectives could make additional inquiries to clear up the ambiguous request and that, while in the process of clearing up the ambiguity, defendant voluntarily waived his right to counsel. We affirm.

This case arises from the murder of Eddie Lee Gibbs. Defendant and Kevin…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Connecticut v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. State v. IsomOregon Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HolcombCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. State v. GableCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. State v. DahlenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. State v. SanelleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. State v. TrenaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API