Legal Opinion
In Re Nassar
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 7, 2008No. 2006-870PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
The petitioner, George J. Nassar (husband), appeals the Plymouth Family Division’s (Carbon, J.) award of permanent monthly alimony to the respondent, Maureen Nassar (wife), in the amount of $1,100. We vacate and remand.
I. Facts
The record supports the following facts. The husband and wife are fifty-six and fifty-three years old, respectively. They were married on April 16, 1983, after residing together for approximately ten years. They have two children, both of whom are now emancipated adults.
Throughout the duration of the marriage, the husband’s parents permitted the couple and their…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Rubin v. RubinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- In Re HampersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- In re DonovanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Mumma v. MummaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. McAdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mellin v. Northern Security InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- In Re SawyerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- In the Matter of Robert Kempton and Peggy KemptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- In the Matter of Susan Spenard and David SpenardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- Susan Achille v. George Achille, Jr.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.