Legal Opinion

Mellin v. Northern Security Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 24, 2015No. 2014-020PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConboy, J.

The plaintiffs, Doug and Gayle Mellin, brought a declaratory judgment action asserting, in relevant part, that their homeowner’s insurance policy with the defendant, Northern Security Insurance Company, Inc. (Northern), requires Northern to reimburse them for losses to their condominium caused by cat urine odor. The plaintiffs appeal an order of the Superior Court (Wageling, J.) granting summary judgment in favor of Northern. We vacate in part, reverse in part, and remand.

I. Background

The record on summary judgment supports the following facts or they are otherwise undisputed. The plaintiffs…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. American States Insurance v. KolomsIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. MacKinnon v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Deni Associates of Florida, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1998
  4. Sentinel Management Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Titan Holdings Syndicate, Inc. v. The City of Keene, New HampshireCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 2022
  2. Tapestry, Inc. v. Factory Mut. InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  3. Mass. Bay Ins. Co. v. Am. Healthcare Servs. Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
  4. Michelle Russell & a. v. NGM Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
  5. Connecticut Dermatology Group, PC v. Twin City Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2023

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API