Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Susan Spenard and David Spenard

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 17, 2014No. 2013-0343PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.

The petitioner, Susan Spenard, appeals final orders of the Circuit Court {Sadler, J.) in her divorce from the respondent, David Spenard. She argues that the trial court erred by: (1) imputing income to her of $4,000 per month for purposes of child support and alimony; (2) denying her request to reopen the. case based upon newly-discovered medical evidence; (3) not accounting for two promissory notes, one of which the respondent sold prior to the final hearing, in dividing the marital estate; and (4) misidentifying two investment accounts, and awarding the respondent an interest in one of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re HampersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  2. In re DonovanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  3. In Re AubeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  4. In Re ChamberlinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  5. In re PrestonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Tammy Rokowski and Shane RokowskiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
  2. In the Matter of Robert Kempton and Peggy KemptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
  3. In the Matter of Nadeau & NadeauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2024
  4. In the Matter of Sean Braunstein and Jericka BraunsteinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API