In the Matter of Susan Spenard and David Spenard
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
The petitioner, Susan Spenard, appeals final orders of the Circuit Court {Sadler, J.) in her divorce from the respondent, David Spenard. She argues that the trial court erred by: (1) imputing income to her of $4,000 per month for purposes of child support and alimony; (2) denying her request to reopen the. case based upon newly-discovered medical evidence; (3) not accounting for two promissory notes, one of which the respondent sold prior to the final hearing, in dividing the marital estate; and (4) misidentifying two investment accounts, and awarding the respondent an interest in one of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re HampersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- In re DonovanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- In Re AubeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- In Re ChamberlinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- In re PrestonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In the Matter of Tammy Rokowski and Shane RokowskiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- In the Matter of Robert Kempton and Peggy KemptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- In the Matter of Nadeau & NadeauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2024
- In the Matter of Sean Braunstein and Jericka BraunsteinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2020