Legal Opinion

Carnahan v. Shull

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 19, 1913No. 8,007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Prom Dekalb Circuit Court; Frank M. Powers, Judge. Action by Perry Carnahan against Thomas Shull and another. Prom the judgment rendered, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFelt, J.

Appellees, husband and wife, owned twenty-five acres of land, as tenants by entirety, and executed a mortgage on the same to secure two notes, each for $150, executed by appellee, Thomas Shull, to appellant. Appellant *350brought suit on the notes and to foreclose his mortgage. The complaint in addition to the usual averments in such suits charged that the notes were given for the price of two horses sold by appellant to the appellees jointly; that appellee, Florence Shull, agreed to execute the notes and mortgage with her husband, but only executed the mortgage and did not sign the notes; that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. National State Bank v. Sandford Fork & Tool Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Mug v. OstendorfIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. City of Indianapolis v. Board of Church Extension of the United Presbyterian ChurchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Geiger v. Town of ChurubuscoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harris v. RiggsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Trook v. CrouchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Benedict v. BushnellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Craig Brokerage Co. v. Joseph A. Goddard Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API