Mug v. Ostendorf
Indiana Court of Appeals
Action by Mary J. Mug against John Ostendoi’f. Prom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFelt, C. J.
Appellant brought this action against appellee to recover for services as his housekeeper and for money expended in furnishing him with food and provisions. Issues were joined, the cause was submitted to the court without the intervention of a jury, and upon request the court made a special finding of facts and stated its. conclusions of law thereon, which were in favor of appellee. Prom the judgment rendered thereon this appeal was taken, and the only error relied on for reversal is that the court erred in its conclusions of law.
The court found that on June 13, 1906, appellee, a widower,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. PutnamSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. RichardsIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Lincoln v. PowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Perkins v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- McNair v. BergerMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- Hirsch v. Merchants National Bank & T. Co. of Ind.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- MILLER v. LongIndiana Court of Appeals · 1956
- Hay v. Meridian Life & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1913
- Knutsen v. DilgerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.