Legal Opinion

Craig Brokerage Co. v. Joseph A. Goddard Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 1931No. 14,080PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This is an action in replevin by the Joseph A. Goddard Company, appellee herein, against the Craig Brokerage Company, Robert L. Craig and Tripp Warehouse Company, appellants, for the possession of 950 cases of canned tomatoes alleged to be the property of appellee and to have been wrongfully detained by the appellants. The complaint was in the usual form in replevin and was in one paragraph; answer in general denial by Craig Brokerage Company and Robert L. Craig.

The facts were found specially by the court and are, in substance, as follows: Appellee is an Indiana corporation and, for more than…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Terry v. . WheelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. A. J. Neimeyer Lumber Co. v. Burlington & Missouri River RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Pond Creek Mill & Elevator Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920
  4. Meyer v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Neer v. LangCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wilson & Co. v. Fremont Cake & Meal Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1948
  2. Johnson v. BantaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Lansdowne Distillery, Inc. v. Duggan's Distillers Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API