Legal Opinion

Elkjer v. City of Rapid City

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2005No. NonePublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Under a Rapid City ordinance, homeowners are responsible for damage to their property caused by service lines extending from the City’s water main to the water stop on the homeowner’s property. When the homeowners here sued the City to recover for damage caused by a broken service line, the circuit court granted the City’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. On appeal, plaintiffs contend that the City’s ordinance violates the open courts provision of the South Dakota Constitution as an unwarranted extension of sovereign…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fenske Media Corp. v. Banta Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Rosborough v. City of MolineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  3. Jackson v. City of EllendaleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Olesen v. Town (City) of HurleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Glennon's Milk Service, Inc. v. West Chester Area Municipal AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Nygaard v. Sioux Valley Hospitals & Health SystemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Gruhlke v. Sioux Empire Federal Credit Union, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Sisney v. Best Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. North American Truck & Trailer, Inc. v. M.C.I. Communication Services, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Sisney v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API