Legal Opinion

Jackson v. City of Ellendale

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1894PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Dickey County; Lauder, J. Application by Frederick H. Jackson for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the City of Ellendale to repair the service pipe connecting the city water main with his premises. From an order denying peremptory writ, plaintiff 'appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorliss, J.

The judgment appealed from denied plaintiff’s application for a peremptory writ of mandamus. An alternative writ was issued. To this writ defendant interposed an answer. The proceeding was tried, and the court made its findings of fact and conclusions of law. Upon them the judgment appealed from rests. We will first consider whether these findings of fact, so far as they are unchallenged, warrant the judgment. The unchallenged facts which they embody are substantially the following: The defendant, the City of Ellendale, constructed a system of water works within its corporate limits for the…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Helz v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Horton v. Town of North AttleboroughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Elkjer v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Nord v. Butte Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Birmingham W. W. Co. v. HernandezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API