Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Arizona v. Tohono O'Odham Nation

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided May 7, 2013No. CV-11-00296-PHX-DGCPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAVID G. CAMPBELL, District Judge.

Defendant Tohono O’odham Nation (the “Nation”) plans to construct and operate a major casino on unincorporated land within the outer boundaries of the City of *753Glendale, Arizona, which is in the greater Phoenix metropolitan area. The State of Arizona, the Gila River Indian Community, and the Salt River Pima-Marieopa Indian Community (collectively “Plaintiffs”) argue that the proposed casino violates the 2002 Gaming Compact between the State of Arizona and the Nation (“the Compact”), and ask the Court to enjoin the casino’s construction. The parties have…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tohono O'odham Nation v. DuceyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
  2. Two Bros. Distributing Inc. v. Valero Marketing & Supply Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 2017
  3. Tohono O'odham Nation v. DuceyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2016
  4. Ulrich v. Walker (In Re Boates)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. Hoover v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API