Legal Opinion
Tohono O'odham Nation v. Ducey
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided March 30, 2016No. CV-15-01135-PHX-DGCPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
David G. Campbell, United States District Judge
In May 2013, this Court ruled that the Gaming Compact between the State of Arizona and the Tohono O’odham Nation did not prohibit the Nation from building a new casino in the Phoenix metropolitan area. Arizona v. Tohono O’odham Nation, 944 F.Supp.2d 748 (D.Ariz.2013) (“Tohono O’odham II”). Subsequently, the Nation began constructing a casino known as the West Valley Resort in Glendale, Arizona, a suburb of Phoenix. In April 2015, while construction was ongoing, Daniel Bergin, Director of the Arizona Department of Gaming (“ADG”), wrote a…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Arizona v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. Seneca CountyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017
- Alaska Logistics, LLC v. Newtok Vill. CouncilDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2019
- Cherokee Nation v. United States Department of InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- SDP Kyrene LLC v. Kyrene Shopping Center LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
- TD Professional Services v. Truyo IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024