Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Roberts

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 1914No. 3947PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Weld District Court. Hon. J. E. Garrigues, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

For convenience, the plaintiff in error will be called defendant, and defendant in error will be called plaintiff, as in the trial court.

March 17, 1909, plaintiff purchased, and obtained a deed for section 29, township 6 north, range 63 west, Weld county, Colorado. September 22nd he filed his complaint, in the nature of ejectment, against defendant Edwards and one R. E. Dougherty, alleging ouster of the plaintiff from about 200 acres of,said land, and asked for possession, and damages in the sum of $10,000.. The act of defendant constituting the alleged ouster was the flooding, in the spring…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Platt v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Roberts v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Broder v. Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Yunker v. NicholsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1872
  5. Schilling v. RomingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1878

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Peckham v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Seven Lakes Reservoir Co. v. MajorsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  4. Haines v. MarshallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  5. Holbrook Irr. Dist. v. Arkansas Valley Sugar Beet & Irrigated Land Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API